You can listen live here. We will be talking about my book An Impossible Invention, and about the recent third party report on the E-Cat. It seems it works! Sifferkohl was right and the oil market is replaced by LENR.
Exactly as it has been at end of and as it will be at end of Whow, amazing …. Rather than quote the material here, I will let Mr. Proia tell the sad story! Coincidentally, his name is Mark as well. I hope Mark Hazelton was just kidding. The jackass in the Huffington Post response was serious! I absolutely agree. And i respect anonymity. If the authors are restricted by NDA from correcting their report they could say that, and it would be a proper response, although remove much of the value from the report.
I doubt that is true since they have already stated it is on ecat world somewhere I think that they would modify the published report if needed to address criticism. But it is an honourable chase and something I have sympathy for. However wild something seems investigation is never a bad thing. It does them no favours to have the sort of hype that Rossi has engendered based on a erroneous testing. If the only allowed purpose for use of the information generated by the test group is publication of one 1 report then without breach of the NDA there will be no revision or extension of the published data.
Whoever you are. Would you care to gve your real name? My real name is Thomas Clarke. Nor are the authors of the report — their status as professors at a decent University lends weight to a report they co-sign. And I am sure he has his reasons not to give documents to anyone.
By the way, the fact you coshed to use your name is a choice of yours. And I will not check it i truly your name — I am not interested in: your arguments are much more interesting. Point is: leave authotity principle to Fusionists who usually ask for documents when you point out some mistakes, hoping this could be enough to stop you. Guess what? Sometimes it is not. A follow-up article in Ny Teknik could be a way to put forward criticism and give the authors an opportunity to respond.
